Top of page
Global Site Navigation

School of Arts and Humanities

Local Section Navigation

Help us improve our content by rating this page.

Page rating system

Please leave a comment about your rating so we can better understand how we might improve the page.

You are here: Main Content

Resettlement pathways: Some problems and fears of prisoners from Acacia Prison returning to the community

For any prisoner, the return to the community at the end of a sentence is a time charged with tension and anxiety. An estimated 30,000 prisoners return to the community every year in Australia (Borzycki & Baldry, 2003). The resettlement process is a stressful and potentially fraught event, because there are a number of hazards and obstacles for ex-prisoners. In some cases, the problems returning prisoners face can be anticipated and alleviated to an extent by the assistance provided by support programs initiated inside the prison. But in other cases, for those without financial or domestic supports or life skills, there is a chance of a relapse into re-offending (Jones, Hua, Donnelly, McHutchison & Heggie, 2006) and the beginning of the cycle of recidivism.

The purpose of this project was to gather reliable and current data on the main problems and fears experienced by prisoners returning to the community. The project focussed on prisoners from the male medium security Acacia Prison, Western Australia, who are already involved in a Resettlement Program initiated by the prison. Many of the concerns of the participants in the Resettlement Programs are well-known to the staff, but there are some matters which prisoners are reluctant to disclose to resettlement staff. It was reasoned that a face-to-face discussion with an impartial and independent interviewer would allow an opportunity for these matters to be discussed. The goals for the prison are to make comparisons with previously gathered data to identify the most effective programs; to modify or rework others; and to provide information for the design of new ones.

Funding agency

Nil

Project duration

January 2010 - December 2012


Researchers

Ms Sharan Kraemer

In collaboration with The Department of Corrective Services

Skip to top of page