Top of page
Global Site Navigation

School of Psychology and Social Science

Local Section Navigation
You are here:
ECU is currently converting this web content to a more mobile friendly format. If you find the content below is not formatting correctly during this transition please view on desktop browser.
Main Content

Professor Beth Armstrong

Head of School

Contact Information Email: b.armstrong@ecu.edu.au,
Staff Member Details
Email: b.armstrong@ecu.edu.au   

 

Current Teaching

  • Unit Coordinator - SPE3112 Language Difference: Implications for Clinical Practice

Background

Professor Beth Armstrong is Foundation Chair in Speech Pathology and was appointed Head of the School of Psychology and Social Science in April, 2013. Along with a new Speech Pathology team recruited to ECU in 2009, Professor Armstrong established a fully accredited undergraduate Speech Pathology program and a postgraduate research program. Prior to coming to ECU, she worked at Macquarie University in Sydney, where she established the first Speech Pathology Masters program in NSW. Professor Armstrong worked in the hospital sector as a clinician in Sydney for many years before taking up an academic career, focusing on acute inpatient care as well as longer-term rehabilitation for people with communication disorders after stroke.

Professor Armstrong’s research is primarily in the area of aphasia – language difficulty after stroke. Her work includes the application of Systemic Functional Linguistic theory to the everyday discourse of people with aphasia, early intervention strategies, and issues related to communication disorders in Australian Aboriginal populations. Her current projects funded by the NH&MRC involve a multi-centre randomised control trial of very early intervention for people with aphasia after stroke (“Very Early Rehabilitation of Speech - VERSE”), and an exploration into communication disorders in Aboriginal peoples in Western Australia (“Missing Voices: An investigation into acquired communication disorders after stroke and traumatic brain injury in Indigenous Australians”).

Professor Armstrong presents regularly at both national and international speech pathology, linguistics, allied health and medical conferences and has published widely in the area of aphasia. She has represented Australia on several international working parties on aphasia, including one developing the Talkbank Project at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh (a large web-based corpus of speech samples gathered for the purpose of international collaborative research). She is an Associate Investigator on the NH&MRC funded Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation.

Professor Armstrong was founding Editor of Advances in Speech Language Pathology, now entitled the International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, has been Guest Editor of the Clinical Aphasiology Conference special issues of the international journal Aphasiology from 2007 - 2010, Seminars in Speech and Language, Journal of Neurolinguistics, and is on numerous international editorial boards.

Professional Memberships

  • Speech Pathology Association of Australia

Awards and Recognition

Other

  • Fellow of the Speech Pathology Association of Australia

Research Areas and Interests

  • Neurogenic communication disorders
  • Aphasic discourse
  • Linguistic applications to the analysis and treatment of aphasia
  • Conversation partner training in aphasia
  • Social models of disability
  • Social ramification of communication disorder
  • The discourse of clinical interactions
  • Aboriginal English
  • Communication difficulties after stroke in Indigenous Australians

Staff Qualifications

  • Doctor of Philosophy, Macquarie University, 1997 .
  • Master of Arts, Macquarie University, 1988 .

Research

Recent Research Grants

  • Missing voices: Communication difficulties after stroke and traumatic brain injury in Indigenous Australians,  National Health and Medical Research Council,  Project Grants,  2013 - 2016,  $634,088.
  • Very Early Rehabilitation in SpEech: An RCT of aphasia therapy after stroke,  National Health and Medical Research Council,  Project Grants,  2013 - 2016,  $742,000.
  • Standard Equipment Grant 2012,  National Health and Medical Research Council,  Equipment Grant 2012,  2012 - 2014,  $5,744.
  • Learning not to talk: Is communication "learned non-use" following stroke a reality?,  Edith Cowan University,  ECU Early Career Researcher - Grant,  2011,  $23,622.
  • Communication difficulties after stroke in Indigenous Australians: Issues and attitudes,  Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies,  AIATSIS - Grant,  2010 - 2011,  $35,541.

Recent Publications (within the last five years)

Book Chapters

  • Armstrong, B., Ferguson, A., Simmons-Mackie, N., (2011), Discourse and functional approaches to aphasia. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders, 1(1), 217-232, Sudbury, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Armstrong, B., Ferguson, A., Mortensen, L., (2011), Public and private identity: The co-construction of aphasia through discourse. Discourses of deficit, 1(17), 215-234, London.
  • Armstrong, B., Ferguson, E., (2010), Interacting with difficulty: The case of aphasia. New adventures in language and interaction, 199-221, Amsterdam.

Journal Articles

  • Godecke, E., Rai, T., Ciccone, N., Armstrong, B., Granger, A., Hankey, G., (2013), Amount of therapy matters in very early aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: A clinical prognostic model. Seminars in Speech and Language, 34(3), 129-141, United States, DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358369.
  • Cherney, L., Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, B., Holland, A., (2013), Systematic Review of Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: Methodological Quality. International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 15(5), 535-545, United Kingdom, DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2013.763289.
  • Armstrong, B., Fox, S., Wilkinson, R., (2013), Mild aphasia: is this the place for an argument?. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 22(Supplement), N S268-S278. , Washington, DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0084.
  • Armstrong, B., Hersh, D., Hayward, C., Fraser, J., Brown, M., (2012), Living with aphasia: Three Indigenous Australian stories. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(3), 271-280, DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2011.663790.
  • Armstrong, B., Mortensen, L., Ciccone, N., Godecke, E., (2012), Expressing opinions and feelings in a conversational setting. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33(1), 16-26, DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1301160.
  • Armstrong, B., (2012), Discourse across disorders: Acquired neurogenic conditions. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33(1), 3, DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1301158.
  • Fromm, D., Holland, A., Armstrong, B., Forbes, M., Macwhinney, B., Risko, A., Mattison, N., (2011), ?Better But No Cigar?: Persons with Aphasia Speak about their Speech. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1431-1447, UK: Abingdon, Oxon, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.608839.
  • Armstrong, B., (2011), Introduction. Aphasiology, 25(6-7), 673, DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2011.587705.
  • Armstrong, B., Ciccone, N., Godecke, E., Kok, B., (2011), Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: Some initial comparisons. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1347-1371, DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2011.577204.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, S., Armstrong, B., Holland, A., Cherney, L., (2010), Communication Partner Training in Aphasia:A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(12), 1814-1837, New York, NY, DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026.
  • Barnes, S., Armstrong, B., (2010), Conversation after right hemisphere brain damage: Motivations for applying conversation analysis. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24(1), 55-69, London, DOI: 10.3109/02699200903349734.
  • Armstrong, B., Ferguson, A., (2010), Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480-496, Hove, DOI: 10.1080/02687030902775157.

Research Student Supervision

Principal Supervisor

  • Master of Social Science,  Face-to-face: An Exploratory Study Of How People With Aphasia And Speakers Of English As A Second Language Perceive Their Interactions With Government Agencies.
Skip to top of page